RAM VILASH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1069/2025 · 2025-08-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1069 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly by pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Summoning Order dated 08.07.2025 passed by Learned Civil Judge (J/D)/F.T.C. Crime Against Women, Unnao, on basis of Charge sheet no. 01/2025, dated 03.04.2025, in Criminal Case no. 622/2025 arising out F.I.R/Case Crime no. no. 0086/2025, U/s 115 (2)/352/76/351 (3) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita- 2023, Police Station Safipur, District Unnao styled as State........ Vs. Ram Vilash and others, Pending Before Learned Civil Judge (J/D)/ F.T.C Crime Against Women, Unnao, as Contained in ANNEXURE No. 1 and 2 to this Application, during the pendency of this Application."
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, Ana Fatma, Mukhtar Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Ram Vilash And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. August 27, 2025 Mohd.
Sharif NA528 No. 1069 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench