Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160255 (ALL)

TANU MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIA/9745/2025 · 2025-09-04

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9745 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Diwakar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the case of the petitioner for appointment as Data Entry Operator has been processed and he has also been appointed and prays that the writ petition be dismissed as infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Learned Standing counsel as well as Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. September 4, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwakar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Abdul Moin,J.) Tanu Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench