Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16025 (UTT)

JAMEELA v. JAITUN

WPMS/3343/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:10740 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 3343 of 2025 03 December, 2025 Jameela --Petitioner Versus Jaitun & others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Subhash Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. along with Mr. S.K. Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Sabha. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for expediting the hearing and disposal of the Revenue Suit No.28 of 2018-19, Smt. Jameela vs. Smt. Jaitun, pending in the court of learned Assistant Collector (First Class), Vikas Nagar, Dehradun within stipulated time period of six months. 2. The petition from the face of it is misconceived one as the evidence of the parties was concluded on 11.11.2025 and the case is fixed on 16.12.2025 for final hearing. 3. There is no occasion to move such writ petition before this Court at this stage. Accordingly, the same is dismissed in-limine. 2025:UHC:10740 2 4. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.12.2025 AK