Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16025 (KAR)

PRITHVIRAJ SINGH v. SRI. N. R. SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH

WP/24150/2018 · 2025-01-27

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3593 WP No. 24150 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 24150 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: PRITHVIRAJ SINGH S/O. LATE. N.R.SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH, D.NO.331, 1ST STAGE, GAYATHRIPURAM, MYSORE - 570 019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.V.VEDACHALA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. N.R. SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH SINCE DEAD BY LR'S, SMT. KRISHNA BAI, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, W/O. LATE. N.R. SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH, D.NO.1860, 12TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017. 2. SRI. BHARATHRAJ SINGH TAKUR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O. LATE. N.R. SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH, D.NO.1860, 12TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017. 3. SRI. BALARAM SINGH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O. LATE. N.R. SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH, D.NO.1860, 12TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3593 WP No. 24150 of 2018 MYSORE - 570 017. 4. SRI. JAYAGOPAL SINGH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O. LATE. N.R.SINGH @ NAGARATHAN SINGH, D.NO.1860, 12TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.BIJALI SHAMENDRA SINGH., ADVOCATE FOR R1,3 & 4; SMT. ANUSHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.MADHUSUDHANA RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Vedachala.M.V., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Anusha., counsel on behalf of Sri.A.Madhusudhana Rao., for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. 2. The order dated:23.03.2016 passed by the Assistant Commissioner vide Annexure-F and the order dated:06.02.2018 passed by the Deputy Commissioner vide Annexure-G are called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3593 WP No. 24150 of 2018 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The captioned Writ Petition is filed against private individual. Such a Writ Petition is not maintainable. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18