Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16024 (RAJ)

M/S SHREE BHAGWATI STEELS v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/6889/2025 · 2025-05-22

Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21529-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6889/2025 M/s Shree Bhagwati Steels, 49, Kishore Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302039, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, S/o Mr. Ram Niwas Patwari, Aged About 49 Years, 49, Kishore Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302039. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi. 2. The Chief Commissioner, Cgst, Jaipur Zone, Ncrb, Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302005. 3. The Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), Cgst Commissionerate, Ncr Building, Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur - 302005. 4. The Superintendent, Cgst, Range-X, Division-B, 2Nd Floor, Cp-21-22-23, Road No. 1D, Vki Area, Jaipur - 302013. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Finance Secretary (Revenue), Government Secretariat, Jaipur-302005. 6. The Chief Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharma Mr. Naresh Gupta Mr. Kartikeya Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 22/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length is not pressing the petition with liberty to avail remedy of appeal. [2025:RJ-JP:21529-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6889/2025] 2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. 3. In the eventuality of petitioner filing an appeal along with the application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the factum of pendency of this petition. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/17