HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL REVISION No. - 37 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Present revision has been filed challenging the order passed on the amendment application whereby the amendment was allowed. 3. The facts in issue are that the suit in question was filed titled as suit for permanent injunction. In the said suit, a prayer was made seeking directions for the respondents to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff to the said suit. Subsequently amendment was filed in which a prayer was made that in the event the defendant does not execute the sale deed, the Court in question shall execute the sale deed. 4. Prima-facie, even the issues have not been framed. 5. I do not see any reason to interfere with the order allowing the amendment application. 6. The revisionist, however, would be at liberty to take all such pleas including challenge to the present order by preferring an appeal after decision on the suit. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sankalp Mehrotra, Abhishek Dhaon Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Smt. Santosh And 4 Others .....Revisionist(s) Smt. Urmila Mishra .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Present revision is accordingly dismissed. August 25, 2025 nishant CLRE No. 37 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench