HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10192 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 to 3, Sri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5 and Sri Dharmendra Pratap Singh holding brief of Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.6. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 30.06.2019 while working as Associate Professor in the Department of Commerce under respondents no.4 and 5 the respondents have neither paid increment as due to him in July 2015, July 2017 and July 2018 nor have fixed the correct and full pension of the petitioner and hence the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Shivji Shukla, Prabhat Narayan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anurag Kumar Singh, Puneet Chandra Dr. Amaresh Saran Vaish .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Higher Education U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.5 then respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. It is further provided that in case the petitioner is found entitled for any amount the same shall be released to him within next four weeks from the date of disposal of the representation provided there is no legal impediment. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 11, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 10192 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench