RAM MANOHAR SINGH v. DY.DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, RAIBARELI AND OTHERS
A227/5402/2025 · 2025-09-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5402 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Brejendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Raibareli, to decide interim relief application filed in Revision No. 229 of 2025 - Rammanohar Singh @ Durga Baks Singh Vs. Consolidation Committee, Hilalganj, U/S 48 of the U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Raibareli, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Deputy Director of Consolidation, Raibareli, is directed to decide nterim relief application filed in Revision No. 229 of 2025 - Rammanohar Singh @ Durga Baks Singh Vs. Consolidation Committee, Hilalganj, U/S 48 of the U.P Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of service report regarding service of notice upon the opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 9, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brajendra Pratap Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Manohar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Dy.Director Consolidation, Raibareli And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench