HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 882 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner-complainant had filed a complaint on which the District Magistrate ordered an enquiry which has already been conducted, and as per the petitioner, nothing has been found to be amiss. He disputes the enquiry report and challenges it before this Court. 3. The petitioner can approach the District Magistrate concerned and point out the deficiencies in the enquiry or otherwise, unless there is any legal impediment, which can be looked into by the District Magistrate. 4. However, he shall also see as to whether the complaint is actuated by any malafide, as it is informed by Shri Pratyush Chaubey, learned Standing Counsel that the Gram Pradhan has filed an F.I.R. against the petitioner. This aspect can also be seen. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. August 27, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Mishra, Aditya Kumar, Rakshak Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Raju .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench