HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5083 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private- respondent is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of appeal bearing Case No.A/2534/2012 (Baroda U.P. Gramin Bank v. Anup Kumar Srivastava and anohter) pending before the respondent No.1. 4. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Case No.A/2534/2012 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. August 28, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Tiwari, Kaushal Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pankaj Patel, Prashant Kumar Srivastava (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Anup Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Lko. Thru. Chairman Members And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench