Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160206 (ALL)

CHANDRAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5073/2025 · 2025-08-27

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5073 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent no. 2 to decide Restoration Application (RST/12272/2025) (Computerized No. T202508300412272)(Smt. Chandrawati Vs. Gaon Sabha) in Case No. 318 of 2012 (Computerized Case No. T201208304704318) U/S 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Kamini Prasad) expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2-Tehsildar (Judicial) Gonda, District - Gonda is directed to decide Restoration Application (RST/12272/2025) (Computerized No. T202508300412272)(Smt. Chandrawati Vs. Gaon Sabha) in Case No. 318 of 2012 (Computerized Case No. T201208304704318) U/S 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Gaon Sabha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Seema Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Chandrawati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Vs. Kamini Prasad), expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 27, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5073 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench