Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160203 (ALL)

RAJ KISHOR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BAHRAICH AND OTHERS

WRIC/8335/2025 · 2025-09-02

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8335 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent No. 1 for compliance of order dated 01.07.2023 passed by respondent No. 2 in Case No. 5821/2022, Computerized Case No. T-202208150305821 (Raj Kishor Vs. Virendra Vikram Singh & others), U/S 117 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006in demarcation suit no. 02338/2019, bearing computerized Suit No. T201902570102338/2018 (Bade Lal & others Vs. Anil Kumar & others) U/S 24 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection and submits that petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by revenue authorities and without approaching the competent authority, present writ petition has been filed. 4. In light of the above, considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual, this Court declines to interfere with the present matter. 5. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, before the competent authority within two weeks from today and in case such an application is made within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Karam Chand Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raj Kishor .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Bahraich And Others .....Respondent(s) the prescribed period, the said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. September 2, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 8335 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench