HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8337 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. In light of the proposed order to be passed, notices to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents for compliance/execution of order dated 20.06.2019 passed in demarcation suit no. 02338/2019, bearing computerized Suit No. T201902570102338/2018 (Bade Lal & others Vs. Anil Kumar & others) U/S 24 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection and submits that petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by revenue authorities and without approaching the competent authority, present writ petition has been filed. 5. In light of the above, considering that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving appropriate application under Para 460 of Revenue Court Manual, this Court declines to interfere with the present matter. 6. Accordingly, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual, before the competent authority Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prithvi Pal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) within two weeks from today and in case such an application is made within the prescribed period, the said authority is directed to proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. September 2, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 8337 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench