Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160200 (ALL)

RAM ADHAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 15 OTHERS

WPIL/884/2025 · 2025-09-01

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 884 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel, based on instructions, states that proceedings under Section 67 have been initiated. The instructions are taken on record. 2. It is clear from the instructions that after passing of the order under Section 67, applications have been moved for recall, which are said to be pending for decision. 3. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of with direction that the proceedings, where the recall applications have been filed and are pending, shall be concluded with all expedition within a period of 90 days from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. September 1, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Adhar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 15 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench