APHC010207892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10800/2025 Between: S Ramanjaneyulu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2 HCGR, J W.P.No.10800 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent not considering the Representation dated 27.2.2025 is as illegal, arbitrary and un- constitutional and violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to consider the representations dated 27.2.2025 of petitioner forthwith and pass such other order or orders…” 2. Heard Sri T.V.V.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondents. 3. Petitioner, who is working as Senior Assistant at Primary Health Center, Sambepalli, Annamayya District, proceeded on long leave on 25.08.2023, on account of his health conditions and later he has reported back on 29.02.2024. He has made request for issuing reposting orders to Kadapa town on medical grounds, as he has undergone treatment. However, the 3rd respondent has issued reposting orders vide Rc.No.390/C2/2024, dated 10.04.2024, placing the petitioner once again at same place without considering petitioner’s request. Petitioner submitted representation dated 26.02.2025 to 2nd respondent, by citing that similarly situated persons have been reposted at places of their request, due to the 3 HCGR, J W.P.No.10800 of 2025 reasons stated therein, therefore, petitioner also may be extended same benefit, which is stated to be pending. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner. 5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the representation will be considered in accordance with law. 6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on petitioner’s representation 26.02.2025, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 25.04.2025 KBN