SMT. VIDYAWATI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/5093/2025 · 2025-08-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5093 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 2 to decide conclude and pass final order in Revision including pending Restoration Application No. 1987 of 2024 and Substitution applications of late Sushruta and late Chmaeli in (Computerize Case No. R20181033001031) U/S 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the Restoration Application No. 1987 of 2024 moved in the aforesaid case.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2- Judicial Member, Board of Revenue U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Restoration Application No. 1987 of 2024, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manzar Ali Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Vidyawati And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 28, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5093 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench