BIJAY SINGH SARDAR ALIAS BIJAY SARDAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3616/2024 · 2025-03-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16016 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16016 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 3616 of 2024
1. Bijay Singh Sardar @Bijay Sardar aged about 43 years son of Sukhlal Sardar resident of village - Hudu, P.O. Hudu, P.S, Kandra, Distt. Seraikella- Kharsawan (Jharkhand)
2. Birendra Sardar aged about 34 years son of Sukhlal Sardar resident of village Hudu, P.O. Hudu, P.S. -Kandra, Distt. - Seraikella- Kharsawan (Jharkhand).
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl. PP
06 / 10.03.2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No. 08 of 2023 registered under Sections 18 (b) of the NDPS, Act.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are involved in cultivation of poppy. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioners have been implicated in this case only on the basis of anonymous information as the police has not even disclosed the name of the person, who alleged that the petitioners have been involved in cultivation of poppy. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 8 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this
order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No. 08 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C..
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-