HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5077 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Head Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner as well as leaned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to move an appropriate application before the authority concerned where the proceedings are pending. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid submission. 4. Accordingly, in view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. August 27, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Hasina Begam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench