Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16015 (GAU)

BABIBUL ISLAM @ BABIDUL ISLAM v. ALIA KHATUN

I.A.(Crl.)/702/2024 · 2025-05-20

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154692024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/702/2024 BABIBUL ISLAM @ BABIDUL ISLAM S/O SHARAP ALI, VILL-TEMURE DONGRA, P.S.-BARPETA, P.O.-PAHUMARA, DIST- BARPETA (ASSAM), PIN-781308 VERSUS ALIA KHATUN D/O ALIM UDDIN, VILL- TEDHARAGAON, P.O.-MANDIA, DIST- BARPETA (ASSAM), PIN-781308 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID, MS. T BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R ALI, MR. NIMISH MAHAJAN, AMICUS CURIAE,MR. H A AHMED Linked Case : BABIBUL ISLAM @ BABIDUL ISLAM S/O SHARAP ALI VILL-TEMURE DONGRA P.S.-BARPETA P.O.-PAHUMARA DIST- BARPETA (ASSAM) PIN-781308 VERSUS ALIA KHATUN D/O ALIM UDDIN VILL- TEDHARAGAON Page No.# 2/2 P.O.-MANDIA DIST- BARPETA (ASSAM) PIN-781308 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A ROSHID Advocate for : appearing for ALIA KHATUN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 21 .05. 2025 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. H.A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent. Also heard Mr. N. Mahajan, learned Amicus Curiae. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condoning the delay of 123 days in preferring the connected criminal revision petition. This court is of the view that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the delay of 123 days is condoned. The Registry is directed to register the connected criminal revision petition and list accordingly. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant