AJAY DIXIT v. U.O.I. THE ADDL CHIEF SECY. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPTT. OF EXPENDITURE,NEW DELHI AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8258/2025 · 2025-08-29
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8258 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 3 to 5 and Sri Surya Prakash, Advocate who has filed his memo of appearance on behalf of the respondent no.1, which is taken on record. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite party nos. 3 to 5 to forthwith return the said vehicle to the petitioner, and restrain them from selling or alienating the petitioner's Four Wheeler Motor Car Regn. No. UP 32 NM 4899, Engine No. XZP6B21363, Chassis No. MA1NA2X2XP6B43775. (ii) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding opposite party no.-2 consider and decide the representation of the particular (Annexure No. 1) strictly in accordance with rules, regulations and guidelines of the RBI Applicable in the matter in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of PROHIBITION restraining opposite parties nos. 3 to 5 from taking any coercive action against the petitioner without following due legal process under the SARFAESI Act or other applicable laws. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ishwar Chandra Pandey, Abhishek Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Amit Jaiswal Ojus Law Ajay Dixit .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. The Addl Chief Secy. Ministry Of Finance, Deptt. Of Expenditure,New Delhi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
(iv) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding opposite party concerned to investigate the matter expeditiously, and take appropriate action against the culprits, including recovery of the said vehicle."
3. Sri Amit Jaiswal, Advocate has produced before this Court a copy of instructions sent to him. The instructions say that the account of the customer was classified as NPA and LRN had been issued and the bank had taken repossession of the vehicle in question. The customer approached the bank and deposited the overdue amount. At present his account is regularized. The vehicle of the petitioner has been released, a copy of such Vehicle Delivery Note dated 26.08.2025 is enclosed to the said instructions. 4. The instructions are kept on record. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 29, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 8258 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench