VINDESHWARI PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE / COLLECTOR, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5094/2025 · 2025-08-28
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5094 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide Case No. - 03829 of 2020, Computerized Case No. T202002570103829, U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code (Vindeshwari Prasad and others Vs. Dayaram and others) expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2- Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Case No. - 03829 of 2020, Computerized Case No. T202002570103829, U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code (Vindeshwari Prasad and others Vs. Dayaram and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Yadav, Shashi Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Vindeshwari Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate / Collector, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 28, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5094 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench