ARVIND PRATAP SINGH v. EXTRA MAGISTRATE IST, TEHSIL SADAR, DISTT. AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS
A227/5078/2025 · 2025-08-27
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5078 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent no. 1 to decide Case No. 6353 of 2022 (Computerized No. T2022044230106353) U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Arvind Pratap Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar Singh & others) expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Extra Magistrate-1st, Tehsil Sadar, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Case No. 6353 of 2022 (Computerized No. T2022044230106353) U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Arvind Pratap Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar Singh & others) , expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Rashmi Pandey, Swadha Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arvind Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) Extra Magistrate Ist, Tehsil Sadar, Distt. Ayodhya And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 27, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5078 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench