Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160107 (ALL)

INDRA PAL VARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/8468/2025 · 2025-09-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8468 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Smt. Bhanupriya, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohd. Ateeq Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by order dated 19.07.2026, passed by Tehsildar (Judicial), Salon, District - Raebareli, in exercise of power under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and order dated 03.07.2024, whereby application for recall has been rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that petitioner has alternate remedy of filing appeal against the impugned orders under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the preliminary objection raised by learned counsel for the respondents and prays that present writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the authority concerned. 5. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 67(5) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. September 4, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ateeq Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Indra Pal Varma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench