Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:17108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2312/2025 Balaji Trading Company, Padali Sikrai District Dausa Through Proprietor Bhemsingh Meena S/o Vijendra Singh Meena R/o Khedisheesh Tehsil Hindaun District Karauli (Raj). ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Sunita Meena W/o Ravikant Meena, R/o Plot No. 41A Uma Colony Kamla Nehru Nagar Ajmer Road, Jaipur Proprietor Sunita Filling Station Sunita Filling Station Agawali Sikandra Alwar Mega Highway Dausa Through Proprietor Sunita Mee. ---Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 23/04/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite the mandate of Section 123(3) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, trial is going at a snail pace. It is further submitted that in two years, the trial has not reached at an appropriate stage, which is dehors the settled position of law. Considering the foregoing the fact and circumstances of the case, petitioner is at liberty to file an application for raising his grievance before the concerned Presiding Officer who shall pass appropriate orders, in the interest of justice, as per the provisions and in accordance with law.
[2025:RJ-JP:17108] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2312/2025] Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/45