Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16009 (RAJ)

RAMDHANI BAI WIFE OF RAMVILAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/808/2025 · 2025-05-23

Bhuwan Goyal, Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21792-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 808/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.185/2025 1. Ramdhani Bai Wife Of Ramvilas, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Amlda, Police Station, Itawa, District Kota Rural. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 2. Leelabai Wife Of Devendra, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Amlda, Police Station, Itawa, District Kota Rural. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 3. Sonu @ Sunita Daughter Of Ramvilas, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Amlda, Police Station, Itawa, District Kota Rural. (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. For State(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Addl. GA with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 23/05/2025 1. Heard on suspension of sentence application. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter. Accused-applicants are in judicial custody since long. They were on bail during trial. No specific overt act of the accused-applicants is defined in the FIR as well as in the statement of the witnesses [2025:RJ-JP:21792-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-808/2025] recorded during trial and as per evidence came on record, no specific allegation was proved against the accused-applicants beyond reasonable doubt regarding causing death of deceased Narendra. A perusal of the PMR report reveals that deceased died due to sharp edged injury which is attributed to Ramvilas and hearing of appeal may take long time. Therefore, suspension of sentence application filed by the accused-applicants be suspended and the accused-applicants be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 4. We have considered the contentions. 5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused- applicants-(1) Ramdhani Bai Wife Of Ramvilas, (2) Leelabai Wife Of Devendra and (3) Sonu @ Sunita Daughter Of Ramvilas shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and they be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 03.07.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin/30