Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16008 (AP)

Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/4398/2025 · 2025-06-26

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

'=~ Lit_ee=-=ap lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE gr TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 7 :PRESENT: 7HEfi Between : ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY``*`\ CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4398 OF 2025 / Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, S/o. Mohammed Manner Ahmed, aged 39 years, R/o Flat No.604, Hyderabad, Telangana The State of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. Royal Apartment, SA Colony, Tolichowki, ...Petitioner/Accused No.4 AND Regiv its Public Prosecutor High Court of ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sectio`ns 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C & Under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds fl'led in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the Petitioner who was arrayed as Accused No 4 on bail in connection with Crime No. 382 of 2024 dated 05.10.2024 on the fl'le of Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate,5 Visakhapatnam Dl-strict for offences leveled against the petitioners under 2Soeoc::n 109,%ir318(4 ),131,127(2), 351(2), 61(2) BNS 67-A, ITA-2000-I /I The Petl'tI-On COmI-ng On for hearing, upon PeruSI'ng the Petl-lion and thet ? amr: I;reanntsd UOT so: I g:OuuDn:i#:e#RnA:u:PMOBriA:i:rAedO:oacna:e :oPrO:h eh epaer::I:o ntehr:I and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR3 for the Respondent, the Court made the` following Between : Mohammad Tanveer Ahmed, .HPETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order:I This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/A4, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.382 of 2024 df Kancharapalem Police Station,- registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 308(5), 318(4), 131,127(2), 351 (2) and 61 (2) of the BNS and Section 67-A of the lT Act. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, 'ls that, on 05.10.2024, the defacto complainan{ filed a `report before the police stating that he is a resident of Adreddipalem, Sabbavaram, Anakapalli and he had been running a Coffee Shop a{ VIsalakshi Nagar, Visakhapatnam for the last two years in the name of WABI ART CAFE. About six months prior to the occurrence of the offence, Al visited his shop along with her friend Udaya (Navya) and introduced herself as Digital Marketer and then told that they I would help h,'m f|n development of coffee shop. on one day, Al requested the defacto complalnant to drIVe the Car, on the way Al sprayed somethI'ng on h,'s face and shoulders, for whl'ch when he questI-Oned, she told fhaf I-+ `^,^^ - I I_.__wvl,." sJIe told that I-I was a body mI|St. thh.:mdhe:a^:,1o_ =?mplaITant felt draws; a:nd u:eu :ns::I:SeTd h,-m back on HIS Cake house. After a few days, Al to her house sltuated at NGGOJs colony for dl'nner. ennr1-... .:_ _ Th e reafter, her to drop jnvl'ted him She offered / __I `+||IIIGl :::duel:ae::oa csoommn:ajlu:I==+af:: :n_=isted h'lm to drink lt. I T-her"i-i;:Gelr, the defacto comp'alnant fe" drowsy and he woke up on the next day mornl'ng at her house. on that day, Al had shown some imI'tate photos jn her mobJ'e, and on seelng them he was shocked and questl'oned about the photos, but she skipped the topl'c Thereafter, Al demanded hlm to glve dl'vorce to hls wl-fe and also to brlng hl's motherJs JeWellary a`hd cash and further she locked him l'n room for two days and further threatened the defacto complajnant to br,ng gold and cash and she also Invited her frlends to hostage hlm and demand money from hIS Parents As the defacto complalnan[ refused AIJs proposal, she broke a glass bottle and attacked him to klll WhJIe, she was ln phone conversa[I'On wJth a boy, the defac{o complalnant ran away from her home on 29.07.2024. 3. Heard. perusedtherecord. 4. Learned counsel for the petltJOner submltS that excep"he confessIOna' statement of co-accused, no other maten'al l's collected showlng the compltclty of the petjtIOner ln the present crlme. He further subm,Its that the confessl'onal statement ,s not admlsslb'e evldence and the petl{JOner here,n has been langulshlng ln Ja" for more than 200 days He further submlts \\`s\\ - \i\ '\ To, that l'n order to overcome the statutory perl-od, the police filed preljmI'nary charge sheet and as of now fl'nal charge sheet js not yet fI-led. 5. on the other hand, learned Assistant public Prosecutor submits that jn the present case, the pe{l-tjoner and his wife are alleged to have done Honey Trap and extorted monl'es from the victims. He further subml-ts that the laptops and other material belonging to the petit,'oner herel-n were sent for analysis. 6. In view of the aforesal|d facts and circumstances of the case and considering the remand perI-Od Of the Petl'tI'Oner, thI-S court js I'nCIjned to grant bail to the petitl-oner/A4 on the following COndI-lions. i) The petitioner/A4 shall be released on ba" on hI-S execut[-ng personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) wI'th two Suretl-eS Of the ll'ke sum each to the satl-sfactf-on of the learned vH Addjtl-onal Judjcl-aI Magistrate of Fl-rst class, visakhapatnam. Ii) On release, the petI'tiOner Shall appear before the station House offI-Cer concerned, every day, between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM, till fI'ljng of the charge sheet. ill) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. 7. AccordI'ngly, the Criml'nal petition ,-s allowed. __--_---LJ&-_-----_- .-------_ --- sD/-K. KASIRAO ACHAR! //TRUE COPY// Fol ASSISTA%FGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER \+-\-| |-` - _ ---_ _ 1. The VII AddI-tiOnaI Judicial Magistrate of FI-rSt class at VI-Sakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam DI-Strict 2. The Superintendent, central prI-son, Vjsakhapatnam. 3. The statI'On House offl-cer, Kancharapalem Police station, Visakhapatnam Distrl-ct 4. One CC to SRI. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Advocate [opuc] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra pradesh [OUT] 6a PSR One spare copy SRK,J DATED :27/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.4398 of 2025 ALLOWED x=[55=rw PRERE _± -Ail i-==.`+_ `:giv},ftk a *~gr;ng '5 8 buN 'ZtlZ5 i.`L S€_ _ie-