RAM SWAROOP v. SRI PADMESH SRIVASTAVA, TEHSILDAR TEHSIL AALAPUR DIST. AMBEDKAR NAGAR
CAPL/2689/2025 · 2025-08-27
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2689 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non compliance of the judgment and order dated 02.12.2024. The relevant direction issued by the writ Court is quoted hereinbelow:-
"Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the Mutation Case No.4173 Computerized Case No.T202104040404173 (Ram Swaroop and others Vs. Dal Singar and others) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No.2 shall decide the aforesaid case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. " The record reveals that the applicant/petitioner has made a representation on 26.12.2024 for deciding the matter expeditiously in compliance of the judgment and order dated 02.12.2024 but from the representation, it is found that the certified/photocopy of the judgment and order passed by the writ Court had not enclosed. On being asked as to whether copy of the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been filed along with the representation, learned counsel for the applicant has replied that from perusal of the representation, it appears that the same has not been served. The order-sheets of the case since 06.02.2025 till 04.08.2025 has collectively been enclosed along with the present contempt application. From perusal of the order sheet, it appears that out of 41 dates, on 38 dates, either the lawyers were abstaining from work or the applicant had taken time for filing evidence. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chanchal Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Ram Swaroop .....Applicant(s) Sri Padmesh Srivastava, Tehsildar Tehsil Aalapur Dist. Ambedkar Nagar .....Opposite Party(s)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt application as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh at the appropriate stage. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
August 27, 2025 Nitesh CAPL No. 2689 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench