- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20836 RSA No. 309 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 309 OF 2013 (RES) BETWEEN: SMT. ERAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA W/O M. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO. 123, SULTHAN THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE ROAD, KOLAR - 563 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M. SHIVAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. N.A. BALAJI S/O N.C. ASHWATHANARAYANA SHETY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, GENERAL MERCHANT, R/AT BRAHMIN STREET, KOLAR - 563 101. 2. SRI. V. GOVINDAIAH. S/O M VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SRI. M. VENKATESH S/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT GULPET, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20836 RSA No. 309 of 2013 KOLAR - 563 101. 4. SMT. KRISHNAKUMARI D/O M. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO. 123, SULTHAN THIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE ROAD, KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KANTHARAJA AND ASSTS., ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 04.09.2013, APPEAL AGAINST R2 AND R3 DISMISSED; R4 - SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 9.10.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.68/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.4.2011 PASSED IN OS.NO.111/2007 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo for withdrawal. It is stated that the appellant has filed the instant appeal challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.111/2007 on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20836 RSA No. 309 of 2013 Kolar and R.A.No.68/2011 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar. The appellant does not wish to prosecute the appeal on personal reasons. Hence, the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. 2. Memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of withdrawal of the appeal, I.A.No.4/2013 does not survive for consideration and accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB CT: BHK