Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160059 (ALL)

NEVAL SINGH @ NEVAL v. ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) II UNNAO AND 3 OTHERS

A227/5074/2025 · 2025-08-27

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5074 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private- respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of R.S. No.590/2016, pending before the respondent No.1. 4. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending R.S. No.590/2016 most expeditiously provided there is no legal impediment, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 6. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. August 27, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Sharan Lal Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Neval Singh @ Neval .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) Ii Unnao And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench