HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1066 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "क- यह िक यािचकाकतार् गण के िवरूद्ध न्यायालय श्रीमान् अपर िसिवल जज, (जूिनयर िडवीजन), कक्ष संख्या - 25, प्रतापगढ के समक्ष िवचाराधीन अपरािधक वाद संख्या 9012/2025, उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार बनाम रत्नेश िमश्रा व 6 अन्य, अन्र्तगत धारा 74.191(2),190,117(2),352,115 (2),333,110 भारतीय न्याय संिहता 2023, थाना देल्हूपुर, िजला प्रतापगढ एवं आरोप पत्र िदनांिकत 28.05.2025 एवं संज्ञान आदेश िदनांक 01.07.2025 को अपास्त िकये जाने का आदेश पािरत करने की कृ पा करें। ख - यह िक सम्माननीय उच्च न्यायालय श्रीमान् जी ऐसा आदेश पािरत करने की कृ पा करें जो तथ्यों एवं पिरिस्थितयों पर पूणर् न्याय कर सकें । ग- यह िक यािचका की सुनवायी िकये जाने के दौरान न्यायालय श्रीमान् अपर िसिवल जज, (जूिनयर िडवीजन), कक्ष संख्या 25. प्रतापगढ के समक्ष िदनांक 16.09.20225 को िनयत िवचाराधीन अपरािधक वाद संख्या 9012/2025, उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार बनाम रत्नेश िमश्रा व 6 अन्य, अन्र्तगत धारा 74,191(2),190,117(2),352,115 (2),333,110 भारतीय न्याय संिहता 2023, थाना देल्हूपुर, िजला प्रतापगढ लखनऊ में प्रचिलत उत्पीडनात्मक अिग्रम कायर्वाही को स्थिगत िकये जाने का आदेश पािरत करने की कृ पा करें ।" 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalit Kishore Pandey, Pawan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Ratnesh Mishra And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. August 27, 2025 Mohd. Sharif NA528 No. 1066 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench