RAM CHANDRA VERMA v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR/U.P. STATE AGRO INDUSTRIAL CORP. LTD. 22-VIDHAN SABHA MARG LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9630/2025 · 2025-08-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160057 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9630 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajeev Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents.
2. Under challenge is the punishment order dated 31.05.2025, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition.
3. The legal ground taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the punishment as imposed by means of the
order impugned is not a punishment as specified under the rules and consequently, the same could not have been imposed.
4. Sri Rajeev Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents does not dispute that the punishment as imposed upon the petitioner is not prescribed under the rules.
5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The
order impugned dated 21.05.2025, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition is set aside. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Zia Ur Rehman, Ateeq Ahmad Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rajeeva Kumar Sinha Ram Chandra Verma .....Petitioner(s) The Managing Director/U.P. State Agro Industrial Corp. Ltd. 22-Vidhan Sabha Marg Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Consequences to follow.
7. However, it would be open for the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law, if required. August 28, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9630 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench