Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160046 (ALL)

GEETA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5102/2025 · 2025-08-28

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5102 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the Revision Suit under section 210 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, REvison No. 351/2021 (Ramakant Vs. Gram Sabha Uframau & another) expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2- Chairman, Board of Revenue, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh is directed to decide Revision Suit under section 210 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Revision No. 351/2021 (Ramakant Vs. Gram Sabha Uframau & another), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Srivastava, Akhand Pratap Singh, Shubham Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Geeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 28, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5102 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench