- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19443 RFA No. 626 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 626 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN: S RAMESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE SHAMANNA, R/AT SRIRAMPURA, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT – 560 105 (WRONG ADDRESS GIVEN BY THE PALINTIFFS) ACTUALLY R/AT NO.381 NAGAVARAPALYA, YELLAMMA TEMPLE STREET C V RAMNAGAR POST, BANGALORE-93 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S RAMA MURTHY, ADV.) AND: 1. SRI RAGHUPATHI S/O SRI MANJAYYA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A HOUSE NO.39, KHATA NO.577, 4TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, EVERGREEN STREET, UDAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560016. 2. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19443 RFA No. 626 of 2020 3. SRI. PARTHASARATHY S/O LATE SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 4. MANUNATH S/O LATE SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT NAGAWARAPALYA, NO.381, C V RAMAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560093 5. SRI.GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT THIMMAGONDAHALLI VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK AND DIST. 562 114 6. SMT YELLAMMA W/O NAGARAJ AND D/O LATE SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT CHALAGENAHALLI, HOSKOTE TALUK AND DIST. BANGALORE RURAL – 562 114 7. SMT.JAYAMMA W/O RAJAPPA AND D/O SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT UDAYANAGAR, OPP SHIVAMANDIR, DOORAVANINAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 016 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURESH J., ADV. FOR R1) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19443 RFA No. 626 of 2020 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.11.2019 PASSED IN O.S NO.2892/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo for withdrawal of appeal. 2. Perused the said memo. 3. The contention of the said memo, which reads as under: “The appellant humbly submits that this Honourable court may be pleased to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn in view of the fact that the matter is settled outside the court by mutual agreement.” 4. Considering the said memo, the leave is granted. The Regular First Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19443 RFA No. 626 of 2020 5. In view of the disposal of main appeal, pending IA’s if any, do not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8