Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160033 (ALL)

ANAND KUMAR DIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10025/2025 · 2025-09-02

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10025 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the concerned authority for expeditious disposal of petitioner's representation submitted for regularization on the post of Sangrah Anusewak. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has drawn attention to the order dated 8.4.2024 issued by the District Magistrate concerned to indicate that issue is still pending consideration before the State Government. 4. In view thereof, opposite party no. 1 is directed to consider and decide grievance of petitioner submitted by means of representations dated 26.2.2024 and 11.3.2024 as indicated in the letter of District Magistrate dated 4.4.2024, expeditiously within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is submitted before the concerned authority. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Prakash Pandey, Devasheesh Kumar Pandey, Umesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Anand Kumar Divedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench