HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6748/2025 Krishan Chandra Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Rzf 566, Street No. 22, Sadh Nagar, Palam Colony, New Delhi ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretary, Jaipur 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Pollution, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 3. District Collector, Kotputli Behror 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Neemrana District Kotputli, Behror 5. Tehsildar, Tehsil Neemrana District Kotputli Behror 6. Director, Department Of Mines, Rajasthan Jaipur 7. New Swastik Bricks Company, Through Proprietor Vinod Kumar, Khasra No. 49, Bhimsinghpura Bus Stand, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli Behror Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/05/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner approached the authorities concerned by way of filing representation in the Month of June, 2022, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till (2 of 3) [CW-6748/2025] date, the said representation has not been decided by the respondents by passing a reasoned and speaking order, so appropriate directions be issued to the authorities concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner by passing a reasoned order. 2. Learned counsel further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024) has directed all the Departments of the State to decide the representation within a stipulated time, but in-spite of passing of the said order, till date, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 5. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 6. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the respondents (3 of 3) [CW-6748/2025] to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/8