Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16003 (JHR)

KARU YADAV ALIAS DEVENDRA YADAV @ DEVENDRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4604/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14690 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4604 of 2025 --- Karu Yadav @ Devendra Yadav @ Devendra, aged about 45 years, son of Basudeo Yadav, resident of Asha Kothi Khatal, P.O. & P.S-Madhuban, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P --- 02/05.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(2), 132, 127(1), 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, pending in the Court of Sri Ishraque Zeya Khan, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion and has not committed any offence whatsoever as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused, Ravindra Yadav has been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.04.2025 in B.A. No. 2984 of 2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the fact that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court, I am inclined to enlarge the 2025:JHHC:14690 2 Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ishraque Zeya Khan, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk