Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160029 (ALL)

SMT. RAJ KUMARI @ JYOTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/8036/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8036 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.20 of 2025, under Sections 85 and 80(2) BNS and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Phardhan, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that that the co accused Premchandra Gupta who is the father in law was enlarged on bail vide order dated 8.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 5738 of 2025. The applicant here is the mother in law. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances and on the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Smt Raj Kumari @ Jyoti be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dileep Kumar Yadav, Pankaj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Raj Kumari @ Jyoti .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8036 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench