Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16002 (UTT)

INTZAR AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1400/2025 · 2025-11-14

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10161 WPCRL No.1400 of 2025 With (Compromise Appl. No.01 of 2025) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. Girish Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Abhishek Joshi, learned counsel (through V.C.) and Mr. Shivam Gulati, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5. 4. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alongwith compounding application i.e. paper no.35 which is supported with the affidavits of petitioners and respondent nos.4 & 5 and the same is endorsed by learned counsel for the parties. 5. Petitioners as well as respondent nos.4 & 5 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsel. 6. By means of this writ petition, petitioners, have sought quashing of the impugned FIR No.382 of 2025 dated 14.09.2025 under Section 108 of B.N.S. registered at Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application and submits that some of the offences are not compoundable. 9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 10. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The impugned FIR No.382 of 2025 dated 14.09.2025 under Section 108 of B.N.S. registered at Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar is hereby quashed. 12. Accordingly instant writ petition stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 14.11.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.11.18 10:48:27 +05'30'