Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16002 (PAT)

Baidyanath Mahto v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/13685/2017 · 2025-04-29

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13685 of 2017 ====================================================== Baidyanath Mahto Son of Late Ram Chalitar Mahto, Resident of Village- Mohammadpur,Muria, P.S. Bhalpatti O.P. Under Sadar Police Station, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Darbhanga. 3. The Commissioner, Darbhanga. 4. The Circle Officer, Sadar Block, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Ray - GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i. To issue direction specially to the respondent no.4 to submit enquiry report to the respondent no.3, which is with regard to land of Khata no.386, Touzee no.6188 and 6189, plot no.576, 577 and 530/1107 according to cadastral survey of area 17 Bighas, 15 kathas and 15 dhoors situated in village Mohmmadpur Muria under Sadar Darbhanga Block, District Darbhanga, Patna High Court CWJC No.13685 of 2017(3) dt.29-04-2025 2/2 which has been issued by the respondent no.3, by his letter dated 3.3.2014 to the respondent no. 4. ii. To issue direction to respondent no.3 to dispose of the petition of petitioner. In which petitioner has prayed to release the land of Khata no.386, Touzee zee no.6188 and 6189, Plot no.576,577 and 530/1107 of area 17 Bighas, 15 kathas and 15 dhoors from Sairat in the light of report of then Circle Officer-Respondent no.3 order dated 27.7.1970 in Sairat Case no.2/70-71. 3. In view of the non appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U