AFTAB AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS VIBHAG U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/9689/2025 · 2025-08-27
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9689 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, and Sri Surya Prakash Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.03.2023 while working on a Class IV post under the respondents no.4 and 5 his retiral dues have still not been paid. He further contends that a letter has been sent by the Deputy Director Local Funds dated 17.03.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-10 to the petition, yet the respondents have failed to pay the retiral dues and hence the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsel appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.5 then Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surya Prakash Singh Aftab Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Nagar Vikas Vibhag U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. It is also provided that in case any dues are found admissible to the petitioner the same would also be paid to him in accordance with law within next four weeks from the date the representation is decided provided there is no legal impediment. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
August 27, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9689 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench