Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16001 (KAR)

SRI.A.BALAKRISHNA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3047/2023 · 2025-07-04

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24131 WP No. 3047 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 3047 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI A.BALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT KANNAMAGALA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHIVASHANKAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24131 WP No. 3047 of 2023 4. THE THASILDAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MANJUNATH K., LEARNED HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 IN NO.RUC(A) 65/2020 INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.5 BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the issuance of notice at Annexure-A in No.RUC (A) 65/2020 by respondent No.3. The said proceedings at Annexure-A is culminated by virtue of an order of demand made by respondent No.2 in No.LND 13/2017 before respondent No.2 (Annexure-E). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24131 WP No. 3047 of 2023 3. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this writ petition. 4. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. All the contentions of the parties are kept open including the petitioner's herein with regard to the observations made by respondent No.2 in No.LND 13/2017. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43