HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9691 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1, and Sri Akbar Ahmad holding brief of Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.2 to 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. Under challenge is the order dated 27.05.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the respondents have rejected the claim of the petitioner for enhancement of the subsistence allowance and have also not processed the claim of the petitioner for medical reimbursement. 4. At the very outset, Sri Akbar Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondents, informs that an order dated 28.08.2025 has been passed, a copy of which has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner today in Court, per which subsistence allowance has been enhanced to 60% w.e.f. 13.04.2023. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is satisfied at this stage with the aforesaid enhancement which has been done by the respondents. 6. So far as the medical reimbursement is concerned, learned counsel for the respondents informs that a seriatum is being maintained for chronic Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vaibhav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Sahaya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) diseases with which the employees are suffering and an endeavour is being made to process the claims expeditiously. 7. It is settled proposition of law that where certain dues are payable to an employee the same cannot be withheld or delayed by the respondents on one technicality or the other. 8. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The order impugned dated 27.05.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, is set-aside. The respondents are directed to re-consider the claim of the petitioner for medical reimbursement. Let a fresh order be passed in accordance with law and relevant rules within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 9. It is also provided that in case any grievance of the petitioner still subsists it would be open for him to approach the Court again. September 2, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9691 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench