HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7847 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard, learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, the issuance of notice to the respondent no.4 is dispensed with. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed with the prayers: "i) To issue the appropriate writ, orders, and directions in the nature of mandamus directing that Case Crime No. 306/2025, under Sections 105,115(2),352,351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, registered at Police Station-Paraspur, District Gonda, be investigated promptly and in accordance with law, and further directing the concerned authorities to take immediate steps for the arrest of the named accused persons. ii) To issue any appropriate directions or orders to ensure a fair, proper, and expeditious investigation of the offence committed against the husband of the petitioner/applicant; iii) To pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit, and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the revisionist/applicant. IV. To allow the petition in favour of the petitioner against the opposing parties." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. The petitioner wants fair and prompt investigation. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations as the investigation is still pending, let the petitioner approach the Superintendent of Police, Gonda, raising his grievance, who shall get the matter inquired and ensure fair and prompt investigation. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved that is in spite of the aforesaid, he may approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate concerned in this regard in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2008) 2 SCC 409. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of. August 28, 2025 Haseen U. CRLP No. 7847 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench