CHANDRA PRAKASH DUBEY AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8024/2025 · 2025-09-25
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8024 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Manuvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and Sri Satyendra Nath Mishra, Advocate, who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no. 4, the same is taken on record. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(i)(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned, FIR No. 0018/2025, under sections. 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) Bns, dated 22-01-2025 lodged by the opposite party no.4 as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition. (II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties, not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report contained in Annexure No.-1 to this writ petition. "
3. Learned A.G.A. has produced the instruction letter dated 24.09.2025 provided by Girish Dhar Dubey, Sub Inspector, Police Station Leelapur, District Pratapgarh, addressing to the Government Advocate of this Court, the same is taken on record. 4. As per the aforesaid instructions, in the present case, investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been filed before the supervisory authority and the same may be sent to the Court concerned very soon. 5. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is consigned to record. However, keeping in view that the offences under which the charge sheet has been prepared are having punishment upto seven years, therefore, the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of dictum of Hon'ble Apex Court in the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Chandra Prakash Dubey And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and in the case of Amanpreet Singh Vs. CBI through Director passed in Criminal Appeal No.929/2021 decided on 02.09.2021 reported in 2021 SCC Online 941.
September 25, 2025 Arun CRLP No. 8024 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench