HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8255 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter up to some length submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow, considers and decides the proceedings initiated under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in the time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow, is directed to conclude the proceedings initiated under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pertaining to gata Khasra No. 321 min, area 0.0630 hectares, situated in Rasoolpur Ithuria, Bijnore, Tehsil - Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the proceedings. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. August 29, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Vatsa, Neeraj Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shubham Tripathi (Alok Mathur,J.) Bankey Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief / Prin. Secy., Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench