DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, LKO. THRU. PRESIDENT MAMTA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTT. BARABANKI AND 2 OTHERS
A227/5116/2025 · 2025-08-29
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159964 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159964 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5116 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Dheerendra Kumar Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Nawabganj, District - Barabanki, to decide Case No. 15390 of 2024 - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Educational Society Vs. Adhyaksha Bhumi Prabandh Samit and Another, U/S 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Nawabganj, District - Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Nawabganj, District - Barabanki, is directed to decide Case No. 15390 of 2024 - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Educational Society Vs. Adhyaksha Bhumi Prabandh Samit and Another, U/S 101 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
August 29, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri, Rajneesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Dr. Rajendra Prasad Educational Society, Lko. Thru. President Mamta Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector / District Magistrate, Distt. Barabanki And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench