HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1106 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Nagarjun Pandey, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 164/2025, under Sections 8/15/29 NDPS Act, Police Station Jaidpur, District Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by Sub Inspector of Police against four persons, including the appliant, stating that on the basis of an information received from a mukhbir, two co-accused persons Arun Verma and Ankit Verma were apprehended and 11 kg. poppy husk kept in a sac was recovered from them. The arrested persons stated that they had purchased the puppy husk from the applicant and other co-accused Tej Singh. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no previous criminal history. 5. Learned State Counsel has opposed the anticipatory bail application and he has submitted that the applicant is accused of offence under NDPS Act and he should not be granted pre arrest bail. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rinku @ Satendra Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) keeping in view the fact that the applicant has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis of custodial statement of two co-accused persons from whom 11 kg. poppy husk has been recovered and that the applicant has no previous criminal history, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be granted anticipatory bail. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Rinku @ Satendra Verma before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. August 27, 2025 Pradeep/- NABAIL No. 1106 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench