PRABHAT KUMAR AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/8452/2025 · 2025-09-08
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 159932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8452 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard Sri Shreyash Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Hari Om Singh, Advocate, who has filed power on behalf of the respondent nos.7, 8 and 9. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, thereby commanding the state respondents, to not interfere in the peaceful enjoyment and possession and land and house, situated at Gata no.362/0.1040Hec and Gata no.363Kha/0.0510Hec situated at Village- Mauja Janaura (BNP) Pargana- Haveli Awadh, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Ayodhya, belonging to the petitioner. ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, thereby, quashing the communication/order dated 07.08.2025 (Anexure no.2), issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ayodhya, wherein on the basis of orders dated 10.10.2023, 16.07.2024 and 10.12.2024 passed by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreyash Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prabhat Kumar Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s)
Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Sadar, Ayodhya, ASDO, Ayodhya and the Ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ayodhya, respectively, he has proclaimed that the petitioner is not the owner of the land situated at Gata no.362/0.1040Hec and Gata no.363Kha/0.0510Hec situated at Village- Mauja Janaura (BNP), Haveli Awadh, Tehsil- Sadar, District- Ayodhya and that he is illegally occupying the same." Sri Shreyash Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as such with liberty to file a fresh. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh petition. September 8, 2025 Rahul WRIC No. 8452 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench