Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9597 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PSS/ 1 1 3 8 / 2 0 2 3 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Ayush Gaur, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Narayn Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. In this writ petition, petitioner challenged the order of transfer passed against her.
4. Learned State Counsel points out that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, transfer order was cancelled, vide
order dated 26.07.2023. Thus, he submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also concedes that writ petition has become infructuous, due to subsequent development.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as dismissed as infructuous.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
30.10.2025
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df 006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA8 75643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.10.31 09:57:20 +05'30'