IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9025 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.5.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Manoj Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi and Ms. Divya Rajta, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishat, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 9.11.2023, passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, titled Vikram Singh v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation (alongwith connected matters), in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishat, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. May 30, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge